Twitter Facebook Flickr YouTube
LATEST AUDIO > May 2013 Extra | LATEST VIDEO > LOFAR
 

November 2012 Extra: Monsters

November 2012 Extra

In the show this time, Dr. Rene Breton talks to us about his work measuring the mass of binary neutron stars, Dr. Malcolm Gray tells us about objects known as astrophysical masers in this month's JodBite and your astronomical questions are answered by Dr. Iain McDonald in Ask an Astronomer.

JodBite with Dr. Malcolm Gray

Dr. Malcolm Gray is a researcher and member of academic staff at the University of Manchester. Malcolm studies interstellar objects known as masers. These objects are microwave and radio equivalents of lasers. Masers allow us to study many types of objects throughout the Universe, from comets, newly-forming to very old stars out to distant galaxies. Malcolm also tells us about the book he has written all about masers.

Interview with Dr. Rene Breton

Christina spoke to Dr. Rene Breton from the University of Southampton about measuring pulsar masses in redback and black widow systems. These systems are neutron star binaries where the neutron star is being orbited by a small star. The neutron star is very powerful and energetic, heating up its companion. This makes one side very hot and bright and the other very cool, which distorts the star's surface and even blasts away the nearer surface. Dr. Breton goes on to discuss how the mases of these neutron stars are measured through colour variations in optical observations as well as discussing their light curves and orbits.

Ask an Astronomer

Dr. Iain McDonald answers your astronomical questions:

Odds and Ends

A team of astronomers have observed the brighest X-ray flare ever seen from the black hole at the centre of our Galaxy. The flare was seen toward the black hole (also known as Sagittarius A*) using the Chandra X-ray telescope and was recorded to be 150 times brighter than any recorded flare seen before. It is hoped that bright flares such as this will help pin down exactly what is causing the regular flares seen from the Galactic Centre.

Binary systems are found at all stages of stellar evolution. A former Jodcast member, Dave Jones, observed a planetary nebula with very collimated jets coming out from the inner core of the object. Models predict that this planetary nebula harbours a binary system of 2 white dwarfs inside.

Astronomers from Swinburne University in Melbourne have observed the second and third examples of what are believed to be pair instability supernovae - stellar explosions marking the end of the lives of stars that are some 150-250 times more massive than our Sun. These 'superluminous supernovae' are caused by the decay of photons into electron-positron pairs in the cores of collapsing stars, and can be seen across the Universe. One of the supernovae is at a record redshift of 3.9, meaning that it occurred 12 billion years ago and is the most distant known supernova. The Swinburne team made their detections using the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and the Keck I Telescope, and now hope to see the deaths of the first generation of stars, which originally seeded the Universe with elements heavier than hydrogen and helium.

Show Credits

JodBite:Dr. Malcolm Gray and George Bendo
Interview:Dr. Rene Breton and Christina Smith
Ask An Astronomer:Dr. Iain McDonald and Liz Guzman
Presenters:Adam Avison, Liz Guzman and Mark Purver
Editors:Mark Purver, Adam Avison, Liz Guzman and Indy Leclercq
Producer:Adam Avison
Segment Voice:Cormac Purcell
Website:Adam Avison and Stuart Lowe
Cover art:An image of Sagittarius A* taken with the Chandra X-ray telescope. CREDIT: NASA/CXC/MIT/F. Baganoff, R. Shcherbakov et al.

Comments

  • Comment by Mark Purver on Nov 16 2012:

    In this month's extra show we have masers and neutron stars, X-ray flares and supernovas - not to mention a good dose of black holes.

    Comments, corrections and clarifications go here.

  • Comment by worcspaul on Nov 30 2012:

    Hi and thanks for the reply on "Ask an Astronomer" November Extra.

    I'm still a teeny bit puzzled though. If the age of the universe is determined to be ~13.7bn years old, and the most distant observable objects are ~13.7bn light years away, how can/could there (potentially) be galaxies further away? "Light just hasn't had time to reach us from the rest of the universe" implies that the "rest of the universe" could be >13.7bn light years away which, in turn, implies an age older than 13.7bn years

    Paul Walsh

  • Comment by Peter Conway on Dec 18 2012:

    By coincidence I asked a similar question a year or two back! The answer I got was that in the early days of the universe the universe itself (space) expanded faster than the speed of light in an effect known as inflation. The result is that the universe may be many times the 13.7 billion light years across that we can see. In fact, the effect known as dark flow shows that there is matter which is having a gravitational effect over the horizon of what we can see. Googling inflation universe will lead you to sites which give more information.

    Peter Conway

  • Comment by worcspaul on Jan 02 2013:

    Just re-listened to the answer and I understand it now. However... is the 13.7bn years derived from what we currently observe to be the rate at which the galaxies are moving apart? Originally it was thought that the rate of separation was constant, but now we see that the expansion is accelerating. Is it possible that the rate of expansion has varied over time, which would affect the caluclation?

  • Comment by Mark Purver on Jan 11 2013:

    Yes, although it's called Hubble's Constant, it isn't actually constant over time! For a universe without dark energy, we'd expect the expansion to slow down (in which case it might tend towards a constant rate or it might eventually go negative and make the Universe contract again). The idea of dark energy comes from the observation that the expansion appears to be accelerating.

    The rate of expansion is derived from the redshifts of distant galaxies and the brightnesses of supernovae within them. Those quantities depend on the rate of expansion at all times from when the light was emitted to when we receive it, which may be billions of years. So you're never really measuring the expansion rate 'now', but rather deriving a value for now based on the cumulative effect it has had over time. The further away you look, the more the effects of expansion have accumulated, and by comparing galaxies and supernovae at different distances you can calculate how the rate of expansion has changed.

    All this depends on measuring redshift and supernova brightness accurately! But there are some other bits of evidence for dark energy - Wikipedia has a good page on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

Leave a comment on this episode in the forum

Download Options

Subscribe (It's free)